Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[factory] move SimulateExecution() out of factory interface #4476

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

dustinxie
Copy link
Member

Description

2 methods don't need to be in the factory interface.

Fixes #(issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • [] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code refactor or improvement
  • [] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause a new or changed behavior of existing functionality)
  • [] This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • make test
  • [] fullsync
  • [] Other test (please specify)

Test Configuration:

  • Firmware version:
  • Hardware:
  • Toolchain:
  • SDK:

Checklist:

  • [] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • [] I have performed a self-review of my code
  • [] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [] My changes generate no new warnings
  • [] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • [] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • [] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@dustinxie dustinxie requested review from CoderZhi, Liuhaai, envestcc and a team as code owners November 7, 2024 00:58
PutBlock(context.Context, *block.Block) error
DeleteTipBlock(context.Context, *block.Block) error
StateAtHeight(uint64, interface{}, ...protocol.StateOption) error
StatesAtHeight(uint64, ...protocol.StateOption) (state.Iterator, error)
WorkingSetNotWritable(context.Context, uint64, bool) (protocol.StateManager, error)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

create a workingset that is not writable

ws *workingSet
err error
)
// TODO: make the workingset not writable, cannot call commit() to write its content to DB
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will update the PR

@dustinxie dustinxie force-pushed the cleanfactory branch 2 times, most recently from f28305d to 32a5529 Compare November 12, 2024 04:37
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems not required to wrap workingSet, b/c Commit is not exported in StateManager

@dustinxie dustinxie force-pushed the cleanfactory branch 2 times, most recently from a5e711a to 6c872cd Compare November 12, 2024 07:16
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 12, 2024

@dustinxie dustinxie merged commit 8e7d62f into master Nov 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@dustinxie dustinxie deleted the cleanfactory branch November 12, 2024 22:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants